tag:support.markedapp.com,2011-09-11:/discussions/questions/6389-bibtex-supportMarked: Discussion 2014-07-25T16:35:00Ztag:support.markedapp.com,2011-09-11:Comment/339032552014-07-25T10:36:28Z2014-07-25T10:36:31ZBibtex support<div><p>Hi,</p>
<p>I've noticed that multimarkdown supports bibtex file by adding
meta data specifying style and .bib file, and citation using
[#citekey]. I tried this in Mark 2 and it didn't work. I searched
the support forum and only found somebody use pandoc to do this. Do
I really need to use pandoc if I want to use .bib file? Is there a
way to do this using built-in multimarkdown support? I really like
Marked 2, thanks for the work!</p></div>Cantag:support.markedapp.com,2011-09-11:Comment/339032552014-07-25T13:34:50Z2014-07-25T13:34:50ZBibtex support<div><p>I honestly have no clue about Bibtex support. I'll have to talk
to<br>
Fletcher and see if this is something I need to build into my
included<br>
MultiMarkdown processor.</p></div>Bretttag:support.markedapp.com,2011-09-11:Comment/339032552014-07-25T16:32:57Z2014-07-25T16:32:57ZBibtex support<div><p>Thanks for the quick reply. It would be very useful for
scientific notes writing. Since it is built-in to Fletcher's
multimarkdown I expected it might not be difficult to do this in
Marked 2 (or I didn't use it correctly). His Multimarkdown Composer
2 also has bibtex support but I prefer Marked 2's way that I can
choose my editor.</p>
<p>Thank you again.</p></div>Cantag:support.markedapp.com,2011-09-11:Comment/339032552014-07-25T16:34:59Z2014-07-25T16:34:59ZBibtex support<div><p>You can always use the multimarkdown binary as a custom
processor, too,<br>
but I believe you'll run into issues if the .bib file and other<br>
requirements exist outside of the folder where the file is, just
FYI.</p>
<p>-Brett</p></div>Brett